Compelling but short observation made by Thomas J. Davis, who is reflecting on Luther's theology of the Lord's Supper: "But too much real insight is lost if wrinkles are simply ironed out of theology" (This Is My Body: The Presence of Christ in Reformation Thought, 108).
It is a great observation, and Davis' verbiage is premier. Theology is oftentimes constructed in a two-dimensional fashion, which gives theology a flattened-ironed-bland-boring and merely-propositional feel. But if Theology has wrinkles, e.g., pesky loci that refuse to be ironed flat, that refuse to fit well under this or that Trinitarian sub-heading, etc., then such wrinkly-nuances make for a three-dimensional(ish) theology. So, a Wrinkly Theology presents the doctrine of the knowledge of God, and the creation that is derivative, as a topological(ish)-tapestry.
Wrinkly Theology is like a great work of art: you can walk back and forth and around it; you can change your point of view and perspective; yet, from every new vantage point, you realize something new - some light-explosion-within-a-diamond like intricacy you hadn't noticed before. But an Ironed Theology (a flattened-two-dimensional/merely-propositional theology) has no such spark, no intricacy, no ebb-and-flow Holy Spirit jet-stream. Wrinkly Theology is something that can provide shape and posture to your life. Ironed Theology is too over-simplistic to meaningfully describe the fecundity of life.
Wrinkly Theology, indeed. Oodelally!
"Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees." - T.J. "Stonewall" Jackson
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Friday, November 22, 2013
JC & MJ
"When I was in junior high I even had a picture of Jesus hanging on my wall right next to the poster of Michael Jordan. In some ways that is a visual example of how I would define my relationship with Jesus at the time. I was a fan of Jesus, like I was a fan of Mike. I had memorized his records and knew his stats, but I did not know him" (Kyle Idleman, Not a Fan: Becoming a Completely Committed Follower of Jesus, 46).
Labels:
Jesus Christ,
Kyle Idleman,
Michael Jordan
Thursday, November 21, 2013
God Condescends
"In relating to us, the triune God creates the means by which he condescends to us. He takes on human language, meaning, experience, and even flesh (supremely in Christ) in order to faithfully maintain his covenant with us; and he does all of this while remaining fully and completely God" (K. Scott Oliphint, Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith, 96).
Regarding the condescension of God, John Calvin drew a correlation between how a nurse who speaks baby-talk with an infant and how God lisps in speaking to us - God condescends "far beneath his loftiness" in order to accommodate himself to us.
Regarding the condescension of God, John Calvin drew a correlation between how a nurse who speaks baby-talk with an infant and how God lisps in speaking to us - God condescends "far beneath his loftiness" in order to accommodate himself to us.
Labels:
Condescends,
Covenant,
God,
Theology & Calvinism
Watchful
"Spiritual warfare calls us to be watchful because Satan's chief means of destroying people is through deception (Gen. 3:1-5, 13; John 8:44; 2 Cor. 11:3; 1 Tim. 2:14; Rev. 12:9)" (Joel R. Beeke & Mark Jones, A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life, 194).
Labels:
Satan,
Spiritual War
Following Jesus
"If you read through the four Gospels that tell of Christ's life, you'll find that Jesus says "Believe in me" about five times. But care to guess how many times Jesus said "Follow me"? About twenty times. Now I'm not saying that following is more important that believing. What I am saying is that the two are firmly connected. They are the heart and lungs of faith. One can't live without the other. If you try and separate the message of follow from the message of believe, belief dies in the process. Our churches will continue to be full of fans until we break down the dichotomy between following and believing. Following is part of believing. To truly believe is to follow" (Kyle Idleman, Not a Fan: Becoming a Completely Committed Follower of Jesus, 32-33).
Labels:
Discipleship,
Jesus Christ,
Kyle Idleman
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Frigid Teaching
"For nothing is more frigid than a teacher who shows his philosophy only in words: this is to act the part not of a teacher, but of a hypocrite" (St. Chrysostom, Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles, Homily I. NPNF1 11:4).
Frigid teaching is the worst, indeed. Yowsers!
Frigid teaching is the worst, indeed. Yowsers!
Monday, November 18, 2013
Feminine Faith - Strength of Character
"In marriage, it takes a lot of strength of character to be a helpmate as the Bible describes it and not bail on the marriage. But you're not doing it alone or in your own strength. Never forget that the encouragement, correction, submission, honor, respect, and appreciation that you give your husband each day are lavishly supplied by the One who is also your helper!" (Carolyn McCulley, Radical Womanhood: Feminine Faith in a Feminist World, 90).
Labels:
The Bookshelf
WCF. IV. Of Creation - 1. Q & A
Blogging through and answering the questions from G. I. Williamson's The Westminster Confession of Faith for Study Classes for personal review and comprehension.
Prior posts for WCF. I. Of the Holy Scriptures - Sections 1-10.
Prior posts for WCF. II. Of God, And of the Holy Trinity - Sections 1-3.
Prior posts for WCF. III. Of God's Eternal Decree - Sections 1-8.
WCF. IV. Of Creation - 1.
1. Who created the world?
The true God created the world - the world derives its existence from the Triune Lord. According to Genesis 1:1, "The world is created, not self-existent, and it is God, the true God, who caused it to be" (53).
2. What are the basic points of dogma held by "modern science"?
Modern science teaches the world is "self-existent or eternal . . . that it does not have a derived existence . . . that the present form of the world is the result of a process of selection controlled, not by God, but by the 'principle' of 'the survival of the fittest' . . . that there is no 'ultimate' reason for it" (53). This also was axiom at back Greek-pagan-thought. Heraclitus (c. 500 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher, and, regarding reality, he said, "Neither has any god nor any human made this cosmos, rather it always was and is and will be" (frag. 30). Also, Heraclitus was admired by Cynics, Stoics, and, of course, Nietzsche (see Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy, 64).
3. Is there any proof for the theory of evolution? Why?
Williamson calls evolution a "theory" and a "dogma" that has been believed and accepted for over a century, but "there is still not one iota of "proof" that it is true" [italics original] (54). There can be no "proof" for the theory of evolution because . . . see answer below for Question 4.
4. What is truth?
"Truth is simply that which really is. There is only one truth, because there is only one reality. Therefore, if the Scriptures are true, they merely tell us what really is (or was, or will yet be). When by investigation men also discover what really is in the world of nature, they simply grasp another aspect of the same total truth" (54).
5. Where is truth found?
Truth is found in the "book of life" (the Bible) and the "book of nature" - both have been authored by God.
6. What are some common false assumptions of those who accept modern scientific dogma?
That modern science can deduce truth from observing only the "book of nature". Truth is what really is . . . thus, you cannot deduce truth from the raw facts of nature alone. Truth involves both the thing and God's revelation (God's Word) regarding the thing. In addition to this, there are any number of false assumptions related to production of fossils, assumptions regarding vast stretches of time (i.e., "billions-and-billions-of-years-ago"), etc.
7. State concisely your reply to each of these false assumptions.
I prefer not to. If you address the epistemological presuppositions at back false assumptions, then you don't need to address each of the false assumptions.
8. What is your view of the "days" of Genesis 1?
These are 24-hour periods of time. I believe Genesis 1 is a historical narrative of a one-week-sequence of time.
9. Is the Hebrew term for "day" always used to denote a twenty-four hour period?
No, it is not. As any Lexicon will show.
10. Is there any good reason not to believe that God created the world in six twenty-four hour days? if so, state them.
No - there are no good reasons. The reasoning is always driven by an insipid-and-mildew Gnosticism, so it de facto cannot be good reasoning for a Christian.
Prior posts for WCF. I. Of the Holy Scriptures - Sections 1-10.
Prior posts for WCF. II. Of God, And of the Holy Trinity - Sections 1-3.
Prior posts for WCF. III. Of God's Eternal Decree - Sections 1-8.
WCF. IV. Of Creation - 1.
1. Who created the world?
The true God created the world - the world derives its existence from the Triune Lord. According to Genesis 1:1, "The world is created, not self-existent, and it is God, the true God, who caused it to be" (53).
2. What are the basic points of dogma held by "modern science"?
Modern science teaches the world is "self-existent or eternal . . . that it does not have a derived existence . . . that the present form of the world is the result of a process of selection controlled, not by God, but by the 'principle' of 'the survival of the fittest' . . . that there is no 'ultimate' reason for it" (53). This also was axiom at back Greek-pagan-thought. Heraclitus (c. 500 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher, and, regarding reality, he said, "Neither has any god nor any human made this cosmos, rather it always was and is and will be" (frag. 30). Also, Heraclitus was admired by Cynics, Stoics, and, of course, Nietzsche (see Archetypes of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy, 64).
3. Is there any proof for the theory of evolution? Why?
Williamson calls evolution a "theory" and a "dogma" that has been believed and accepted for over a century, but "there is still not one iota of "proof" that it is true" [italics original] (54). There can be no "proof" for the theory of evolution because . . . see answer below for Question 4.
4. What is truth?
"Truth is simply that which really is. There is only one truth, because there is only one reality. Therefore, if the Scriptures are true, they merely tell us what really is (or was, or will yet be). When by investigation men also discover what really is in the world of nature, they simply grasp another aspect of the same total truth" (54).
5. Where is truth found?
Truth is found in the "book of life" (the Bible) and the "book of nature" - both have been authored by God.
6. What are some common false assumptions of those who accept modern scientific dogma?
That modern science can deduce truth from observing only the "book of nature". Truth is what really is . . . thus, you cannot deduce truth from the raw facts of nature alone. Truth involves both the thing and God's revelation (God's Word) regarding the thing. In addition to this, there are any number of false assumptions related to production of fossils, assumptions regarding vast stretches of time (i.e., "billions-and-billions-of-years-ago"), etc.
7. State concisely your reply to each of these false assumptions.
I prefer not to. If you address the epistemological presuppositions at back false assumptions, then you don't need to address each of the false assumptions.
8. What is your view of the "days" of Genesis 1?
These are 24-hour periods of time. I believe Genesis 1 is a historical narrative of a one-week-sequence of time.
9. Is the Hebrew term for "day" always used to denote a twenty-four hour period?
No, it is not. As any Lexicon will show.
10. Is there any good reason not to believe that God created the world in six twenty-four hour days? if so, state them.
No - there are no good reasons. The reasoning is always driven by an insipid-and-mildew Gnosticism, so it de facto cannot be good reasoning for a Christian.
Singing-and-Praying the Songs of Jesus
"Why . . . can Christians pray the Psalms? According to the ancient church, it is because it was always the Messiah at the head of his people who prayed them; in Augustine's fine phrase, it was always "the total Christ," the totus Christus, Christ as the head and his folk as the body, who gathered in the temple with these hymns and lamentations" (Robert W. Jenson, Canon and Creed, 23).
Four Prime Things
"Christ, the Scripture, your own hearts, and Satan's devices, are the four prime things that should be first and most studied and searched" (Thomas Brooks, Precious Remedies for Satan's Devices, in The Works of Thomas Brooks, ed. Alexander B. Grosart (1861-1867; repr., Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 2001), 1:3).
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Genesis 2:18
"When the Bible uses the word helper, there is a divine context for it. When the word is first introduced in Genesis 2:18 -- "It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him" -- it is the same Hebrew word ('ezer) that is used most often to refer to God throughout the Old Testament. If God, who is obviously and infinitely superior to us, unblushingly refers to Himself as our helper, we should be proud to use the same term" (Carolyn McCulley, Radical Womanhood: Feminine Faith in a Feminist World, 80).
Labels:
OT: Genesis,
OT: Genesis 2:18,
The Bookshelf
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Anticommitment
From Carolyn McCulley's Radical Womanhood (79).
Cohabitation by its definition is anticommitment. A prolonged "maybe" is not a commitment. It's sad that this is seen as a better option to God's gift of marriage. What Scripture portrays is a passionate, secure love between husband and wife, where commitment provides the freedom to celebrate one another and not hedge bets:
You have stolen my heart, my sister, my bride; you have stolen my heart with once glance of your eyes, with one jewel of your necklace. How delightful is your love, my sister, my bride! How much more pleasing is your love than wine, and the fragrance of your perfume than any spice! (Song of Songs 4:9-10 NIV)
Labels:
The Bookshelf
CCS Reflections: Genuine-Gratitude
I recently read the following quote by C. H. Spurgeon:
I remember struggling through the "intellectual" questions raised during coursework at university. (I was a Religion and Philosophy major.) I remember struggling with how best to reconcile (on the one hand) "faith" and (on the other hand) "intellectual integrity" -- e.g., the problem of Theodicy, inspiration of Scripture and the New Testament canon, etc. (I was afflicted with doubts regarding God's goodness, his existence, the perspicuity and truth of Scripture, etc. Those were dark days, indeed.)
However, I vividly remember when a compelling idea - nay! - it was a conviction - surfaced in my head: it was sometime during my senior year, I realized that "intellectual integrity" for a Christian was a myth, in so far as it is constructed as something that must be reconciled with one's faith. The fact of the matter is this: "intellectual integrity" for a Christian is part of the warp-and-woof of faith. Faith is the substance of things hoped for; faith is the evidence of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). Faith is a Christian's "intellectual integrity" - faith is a gift from God, and accepting, receiving, clinging to, persevering in that gifted-faith is "intellectual integrity" for a Christian.
So. Genuine-Gratitude is Intellectual Integrity.
However, in general, the Higher-Education/Peer-Reviewed/Tenure-Seeking/"Free-thinkers"/Men-of-Culture Christian-subculture (whose opinions, as C. H. Spurgeon said, are "not worth a pin's head") have chosen to disagree. If you have genuine-gratitude, then, as I've said before, prepare yourself to be called names. *Shrug*
But the trick is to count it all joy: look beyond the name-calling, look beyond being mislabeled (e.g., Fundamentalist, Anti-Intellectual, etc.), look beyond the complexity of providence, look beyond and lose sight of yourself, and look solely to God who is the author and provider of all.
And if you are looking to God, then you will be able to "respond to each providence in an appropriate way" (see John Flavel's The Mystery of Providence).
Young men have flung away all hope of salvation in order that they might be thought to be men of culture; they have abjured faith in order to be esteemed "free-thinkers" by those whose opinions were not worth a pin's head. I charge you, dear friend, if you are beginning at all to be a slave of other people, break these wretched and degrading bonds.This thought by Spurgeon struck a chord within me.
I remember struggling through the "intellectual" questions raised during coursework at university. (I was a Religion and Philosophy major.) I remember struggling with how best to reconcile (on the one hand) "faith" and (on the other hand) "intellectual integrity" -- e.g., the problem of Theodicy, inspiration of Scripture and the New Testament canon, etc. (I was afflicted with doubts regarding God's goodness, his existence, the perspicuity and truth of Scripture, etc. Those were dark days, indeed.)
However, I vividly remember when a compelling idea - nay! - it was a conviction - surfaced in my head: it was sometime during my senior year, I realized that "intellectual integrity" for a Christian was a myth, in so far as it is constructed as something that must be reconciled with one's faith. The fact of the matter is this: "intellectual integrity" for a Christian is part of the warp-and-woof of faith. Faith is the substance of things hoped for; faith is the evidence of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). Faith is a Christian's "intellectual integrity" - faith is a gift from God, and accepting, receiving, clinging to, persevering in that gifted-faith is "intellectual integrity" for a Christian.
So. Genuine-Gratitude is Intellectual Integrity.
However, in general, the Higher-Education/Peer-Reviewed/Tenure-Seeking/"Free-thinkers"/Men-of-Culture Christian-subculture (whose opinions, as C. H. Spurgeon said, are "not worth a pin's head") have chosen to disagree. If you have genuine-gratitude, then, as I've said before, prepare yourself to be called names. *Shrug*
But the trick is to count it all joy: look beyond the name-calling, look beyond being mislabeled (e.g., Fundamentalist, Anti-Intellectual, etc.), look beyond the complexity of providence, look beyond and lose sight of yourself, and look solely to God who is the author and provider of all.
And if you are looking to God, then you will be able to "respond to each providence in an appropriate way" (see John Flavel's The Mystery of Providence).
Labels:
Faith,
Fundamentalism,
Gift,
Gratitude,
John Flavel,
Theodicy
Art of Dying and God's Peace
"Dying is one of the two most difficult acts of faith (the other is coming to Christ for the first time). But the dying believer who is able to rehearse the blessings of God's providence in his or her life will surely know God's peace" (Joel R. Beeke & Mark Jones, A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life, 177).
Labels:
Apologetics & Christianity,
Theology & Calvinism,
x
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
"A Strange State of Mind"
"The man who supposes that baptism . . . acts mechanically, like a medicine, and that godly and ungodly, praying and prayerless parents, all alike get the same benefit for their children, must be in a strange state of mind" (J. C. Ryle, Holiness, 55).
Labels:
The Bookshelf
Monday, November 11, 2013
Snapshot of the Torah
Genesis - Creation
- Genesis 1 - Creation
- 1:28 - Dominion/Cultural Mandate
- Genesis 3 - Fall
- 3:15 - Inception of the Covenant of Grace
- Genesis 6-9 - Flood
- Genesis 10-11 - Nations/Tower of Babel
- Genesis 12-50 - Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph
- 15:6 - Abraham believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
- Exodus 3-4 - Moses Called
- 3:13-15 - I AM WHO I AM
- Exodus 7-11 - Ten Plagues
- Exodus 14 - Red Sea
- Exodus 19-40 - Sinai
- 19-24 - Marriage Ceremony (Israel wed to God)
- 20:1-17 - Ten Commandments (Marriage means new rules)
- 25-31 - House (God gives instructions for Tabernacle)
- Exodus 32 - Idolatry - Golden Calf
- 32-34 - Marriage Ceremony #2 (Covenant renewal after idolatry)
- 35-40 - Build House (Israel builds the Tabernacle)
- Leviticus 1-10 - Sacrifices
- Leviticus 11-18 - Purity Regulations
- 17:11 - "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul."
- Leviticus 19-27 - Holiness Laws
- 19:2 - "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy."
- Numbers 1-10 - Promise Land/Preparations
- Numbers 11-25 - Promise Land/Rebel - Thus, Wander in Wilderness
- 11 - Israel wants to eat meat - given meat and judgment
- 13 - Twelve spies scout out the land but ten spies provide evil report
- 21 - Rebellion - judgment by fiery serpents/deliverance by bronze snake lifted up
- Numbers 26-36 - Second Generation: Promise Land/Preparations
- Deuteronomy 1-30 - Moses Speaks to Second Generation
- 4:2 - "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you."
- 5 - Ten Commandments reviewed
- 6:4-9 - The Shema: "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord..."
- 29:29 - "The secret things belong unto the Lord our God: but those which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law."
- Deuteronomy 31-34 - Epilogue
- 32 - Song of Moses
- 34 - Death of Moses
Scripture is Sufficient
"We do not need the authority of personal experience to counsel one another because the Bible is sufficient for this task" (Carolyn McCulley, Radical Womanhood: Feminine Faith in a Feminist World, 75).
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Holy Spirit Produces Real Effects
In interaction with John Owen's Communion with God: "The Holy Spirit produces consolation, peace, joy, and hope in believers. The Holy Spirit produces real effects in the experience of believers, experience revolving around Christ as revealed in Scripture. Thus Owen rejected both the rationalists who dismissed the experiential work of the Spirit and the fanatics whose "spirit" disregarded the Word and Christ" (Joel R. Beeke & Mark Jones, A Puritan Theology: Doctrine for Life, 112).
Labels:
Holy Spirit,
The Bookshelf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)